⛧ Xchacha20poly1312 ⛧ @a000d4f7a91939d0e71df1646d7a48@anticapitalist.party

vous avez perdu

Sinon plutôt que de faire la gueule par ce que protonmail respecte pas ses promesses (qu'ils ne peuvent pas légalement respecter), pourquoi ne pas plutôt faire la gueule par ce que protonmail héberge les mails de gab ? Vous savez le réseau social très très fan du premier amendement ?

I just discovered the existence of AsbestOS, for running Linux on PS3, and considering the name, I thought some peoples here had to know about it

Qui est meilleur en épidémiologie

RFC 1871 deprecate the use of SOA DNS records as anarchists don't recognize Authority, or Start Of it thereof

remember to use EUPL instead of (A)GPL, it's mostly the same (I'm not a law person), and it's not made by FSF. Better even : use (C)NPL to prevent big corpos from using your work entirely

https://twitter.com/marcan42/status/1376843838052962308

and that, is why not only should RMS resign, but also most/all of FSF board

git is the first blockchain, and it does not require PoW to function

> sadly you can't change the world only with peaceful talks

that said, you can't change the world only with violent actions either, you need a plurality of means of actions, and that also mean respecting other peoples mode of action

In the end, the question should be : do we really care about hacktivism getting classified as ethical hacking? Because I don't think we should. Many peoples don't consider a riot to be ethic, because some will fight against policemen, break windows... but sadly you can't change the world only with peaceful talks

Sure sometime it's best for everyone to do that, but not always. When I had access to tweets from any private accounts on twitter, I saw a tool that could mainly be used to dox peoples, so it seemed best make that get fixed quick, but when we talk about mass surveillance, it's best to bring that in the spotlight, and you simply cannot with responsible disclosure, at least not as much as you can with a "major hack" headline.

I've seen some peoples talk a lot about how hacktivism is ethical hacking recently, and I have to say, by my definitions, it is not.
I haven't ever considered ethical hacking to be ethical, it's just a set of rules agreed upon, "responsible" disclosure, no personal benefit/agenda... things like that.
And hacktivism just does not fit with that : no personal benefit? I mean hacktivism have an agenda by definition, it's the whole point. Responsible disclosure?

voilà ma contre proposition

Quand tu assumes totalement que garantir des droits aux gens c'est contre ton idéologie

(This post is sponsored by Village People)

DMCA : ❌
YMCA : ✔️

some languages rely heavily on exceptions, Java or C++ are some. But the language that rule them all, is without a doubt French

pick your favorite (very serious) gab enemy