How the different alignments think about punching Nazis.
@gcupc this chart is wrong, the bottom row would also punch the nazis
@Efi eh, I just thought that the bottom row was switched around a little (LE should be Nazis, CE should say what about their rights).
@gcupc that too, but no, nazis are past-evil, they're nazis, evil actually has a reason to be, nazis just follow a fake premise
@Efi The DnD alignment system is dumb, yeah.
@IrisKalmia no, it's not, it's actually pretty valid for most things
it's just reductionist, but as long as you know that
@Efi but you just said it couldn't even qualify nazis as evil. It's dumb.
@IrisKalmia no, nazis are dumb, they're too dumb to be evil
@Efi is this really the take you're going to push? That evil is only immensely intelligent and refined?
@IrisKalmia ok, you're taking it way too eriously now, leave me alone
@Efi Oke, have a good one!
@gcupc Lawful good and lawful neutral would oppose committing assault, even of those they find repugnant.
@mpjgregoire Your campaigns must have very interesting paladins. "I can't slay the evil lichen necromancer, he just has a repugnant opinion that everyone in the village should be turned in to his zombie servants!"
@gcupc I thought Nazis were THE archetypical example of lawful evil.
@gcupc hard to choose a single alignment from those top two rows
Anticapitalist Mastodon instance. Party means fun, not political party. But we're still political.