so I've been catching some glimpses on the nerd-o-sphere about this new political quiz:
From the feedback I was seeing, apparently it's better than the venerable Political Compass (https://www.politicalcompass.org/), if only because it provides more granularity?
Well, aside from the fact that the political compass quiz results come in two axes and this one has *four*... I guess more is good?
@tariqk
Anyway, my results seem accurate (I've considered myself a libertarian socialist for years), but I agree with you that they don't make as principled a case for their system as political compass. Also, I'm not convinced the extra axes give you much extra information.
@tariqk the diplomatic axis is the weakest for me. Like, what if you oppose all war, but support violent revolution (no war but the class war)? Pretty sure that's why I ended up dovish rather than pacifist.
@gcupc It's great when your belong to a superpower, because let's be real here, if you were anything but dovish in a state like, say, Singapore, you'd need a lot more incentive to think war was a good thing, not because of your principles, but the desire to not get your ass kicked.
Yes, I *know*, Singaporeans, national service means you can take us and Indonesia down in a fair fight, I know, I know, I was thinking about us, I was thinking about China, okay?
@gcupc And honestly, I found the whole βprogressβ and βtraditionβ thing insulting. Specifically, the question regarding being connected to the past.
Seriously, you fucks, this sort of question HURTS when you're a member of the colonized, or you belonged to an indigenous group, or you belong to a community that the larger society wants to suppress, thus making your adherence to that tradition REVOLUTIONARY. Shame on you.
@gcupc actually the whole damn thing FRUSTRATES ME TO NO END because the extra axes DON'T ADD new insight, but JUST MUDDIES THE FCUKIUING WATERS